Currently, in Serbia, there is a spark of student protest that is shaking the whole corrupted regime of Aleksandar Vucic and the whole country. This article is written in the name of clearing some things with methodologies for measuring public protest.
Public protests are a vital expression of public sentiment and a crucial component of a functioning democracy. Accurately measuring and analyzing these protests is essential for understanding the dynamics of social movements, political participation, and the effectiveness of collective action. This report delves into the best methodologies for measuring public protests, drawing upon academic research, organizational reports, and case studies.
Types of Public Protests and Challenges in Measuring Them
Public protests encompass a wide range of activities, from peaceful marches and rallies to more disruptive actions like sit-ins and even riots1. This diversity presents challenges in measurement, as different types of protests may require different approaches. Some protests focus on raising awareness through speeches, prayers, or symbolic actions like blocking sidewalks1. Others aim for concrete outcomes, such as policy changes or legislative action1. In rare cases, protests may be intentionally disruptive or even violent1.
Measuring the scale and impact of protests can be complex. Factors like the number of participants, the duration of the protest, the geographical spread, and the level of public support all contribute to the overall impact2. Additionally, protests often involve a mix of online and offline activities, making it crucial to capture both dimensions2. For instance, the rise of leaderless social movements with little attachment to traditional political groupings adds another layer of complexity2. Furthermore, the economic and political context, such as the impact of economic austerity measures, can significantly influence the nature and intensity of protests2.
It’s also important to consider the varying effectiveness of different protest tactics. While peaceful protests are crucial for building and sustaining a movement, more disruptive tactics may be necessary to achieve specific policy goals3. This highlights the need for a tailored approach to measuring protest effectiveness, considering the specific goals, context, and tactics employed.
In conclusion, measuring the effectiveness of protests requires a nuanced understanding of the interplay between tactics, goals, and the broader context. Future research should focus on developing more comprehensive frameworks that capture these complexities and provide insights into the factors that contribute to successful protest movements.
Methodologies for Measuring Public Protests
Understanding the diverse methodologies for measuring public protests is crucial for accurately assessing their scale, impact, and effectiveness. Each method offers unique insights while also presenting certain limitations. Here’s an overview of the key methodologies:
1. Event Counting
Event counting focuses on quantifying the number of protests and the number of participants4. This approach often relies on media reports, police records, or datasets compiled by organizations that track protests4. For example, the US Crisis Monitor, a project by ACLED in partnership with Princeton University’s Bridging Divides Initiative, provides in-depth coverage of demonstration trends across the US5. They collect real-time data to provide timely analysis and resources to support efforts to track and mitigate political violence6.
While event counting provides a basic measure of protest activity, it has limitations. It may underreport smaller protests or those not covered by media. Additionally, simply counting events doesn’t capture the diversity of protest tactics or the level of public support. It’s important to note that a few large events often contribute the majority of protesters, which has implications for resource allocation in protest measurement. Focusing on accurately recording these large events can provide a more representative picture of protest participation.
2. Crowd Surveys
Crowd surveys involve directly surveying participants at protests to gather demographic information, motivations, and attitudes. This method provides valuable insights into the composition and goals of protest movements. However, crowd surveys can be logistically challenging and may not be representative of the broader population. For instance, accessing and surveying participants in large or rapidly evolving protests can be difficult, and the sample may be biased towards those who are more willing to participate in surveys.
3. Qualitative Data Analysis
Qualitative data analysis involves examining textual data, such as social media posts, protest slogans, and media coverage, to understand the framing, narratives, and goals of protests8. This approach can reveal the underlying issues driving protests and how they are perceived by different groups8. However, qualitative analysis can be time-consuming and may involve subjective interpretations8. For example, analyzing the language used in protest slogans can provide insights into the protesters’ framing of the issue, but this analysis can be influenced by the researcher’s own biases and interpretations.
4. Social Media Analysis
Social media platforms have become important spaces for organizing and mobilizing protests9. Analyzing social media data, such as hashtags, retweets, and online discussions, can provide insights into the reach, mobilization strategies, and public sentiment surrounding protests9. However, social media data may not be representative of the entire population and can be influenced by bots or coordinated campaigns9. Additionally, access to social media data can be restricted by platform policies or privacy concerns.
5. Protest Potential Measures
Protest potential measures aim to gauge the likelihood of individuals participating in protests based on their attitudes, beliefs, and perceived grievances10. This concept recognizes that protests are not just spontaneous events but are often driven by underlying social and political factors. These measures often involve surveys that assess factors like political efficacy, dissatisfaction with the government, and willingness to engage in collective action10. While protest potential measures can provide valuable insights into the drivers of protest, they may not always accurately predict actual behavior10. For example, individuals may express support for a protest movement in a survey but may not actually participate due to various personal or logistical constraints.
Technology and Ethical Considerations in Measuring Public Protests
Technology plays an increasingly important role in measuring public protests, offering new tools and methods for data collection and analysis. However, the use of technology also raises ethical concerns that require careful consideration.
Drones and aerial photography can provide estimates of crowd sizes, while social media analysis tools can track online conversations and identify key influencers8. Machine learning algorithms can be used to analyze large datasets and identify patterns in protest activity8. For example, researchers have used machine learning to analyze social media data and predict the likelihood of protests occurring in specific locations11.
However, the use of technology also raises ethical concerns about surveillance and the potential for bias in data collection and analysis8. Facial recognition technology at protests raises concerns about privacy and the potential for misuse of data8. Additionally, algorithms used to analyze protest data may reflect existing biases, leading to inaccurate or discriminatory results11.
Furthermore, the emergence of “protestware” – software that incorporates political messages or actions – raises ethical questions about the responsibility of developers and the potential impact on users12. For example, a developer might modify a software library to display a protest message, which could affect the functionality of applications that use that library.
Researchers must be mindful of the potential risks to protesters, especially in contexts where dissent is suppressed13. Anonymity and data security are crucial to protect participants’ identities and prevent harm13. Additionally, researchers should be transparent about their methods and obtain informed consent when collecting data13.
Comparing and Contrasting Methodologies
Each methodology for measuring public protests has its own strengths and weaknesses. Event counting provides a quantitative overview of protest activity but may miss smaller or less visible protests7. Crowd surveys offer valuable insights into protester demographics and motivations but can be logistically challenging4. Qualitative data analysis allows for in-depth understanding of protest narratives but can be time-consuming and subjective14. Social media analysis provides a window into online mobilization and public sentiment but may not be representative of the broader population14.
The choice of methodology depends on the specific research question, the context of the protest, and the available resources. Often, a combination of methods provides the most comprehensive understanding. For example, combining event counting with crowd surveys can provide both quantitative and qualitative insights into protest activity.
Case Studies of Successful and Unsuccessful Attempts to Measure Public Protests
Examining case studies can provide valuable lessons on the strengths and weaknesses of different methodologies. For example, research on protests in Northern Ireland highlights the challenges of measuring protest in contexts with deep-seated cultural and political divides15. The police often struggle with persistent protests and riots in these situations, making it difficult to collect accurate data and maintain objectivity15.
Studies of extreme right demonstrations in Germany have shown how media coverage can be biased, leading to underreporting of protests in certain regions16. This highlights the importance of considering potential biases in data sources and using multiple sources to get a more complete picture.
A successful example of protest measurement comes from research on grassroots environmental mobilizations17. This research utilized a “protest-case analysis” methodology, which involves compiling information on location, events, groups, time, and issue-claim linkages17. This approach allows for a more comprehensive understanding of the dynamics of grassroots movements and their impact on environmental policy.
On the other hand, the case of charter schools facing termination in Minnesota illustrates an unsuccessful attempt to measure and respond to failing performance18. Despite evidence of academic failures and other problems, regulators often overlooked these issues, highlighting a lack of effective measurement and response mechanisms18. This case underscores the importance of robust measurement systems and accountability mechanisms in evaluating the effectiveness of institutions and policies.
Recommendations for Best Practices
Based on the research and case studies, here are some recommendations for best practices in measuring public protests, tailored to different stakeholders:
For Researchers:
- Triangulate data sources: Combine different methodologies, such as event counting, crowd surveys, and social media analysis, to get a more comprehensive picture of protest activity.
- Consider the context: Tailor the methodology to the specific type of protest, the political context, and the ethical considerations involved.
- Be transparent and ethical: Ensure data privacy, obtain informed consent, and be transparent about the limitations of the data and analysis.
- Use technology responsibly: Utilize technology to enhance data collection and analysis, but be mindful of ethical concerns and potential biases.
- Focus on large events: When compiling event catalogs, prioritize accurate recording of large protests, as they contribute the majority of protesters7.
- Collaborate and share data: Foster collaboration among researchers and organizations to improve data quality and share best practices14.
For Policymakers:
- Understand protest potential: Utilize protest potential measures to identify potential sources of social unrest and address underlying grievances.
- Engage with protesters: Establish positive relationships with community leaders, event organizers, and protest groups through ongoing outreach to help prevent escalation during demonstrations19.
- Use a tiered approach for law enforcement response: Employ a “tiered approach” where officers with heavier gear and equipment are held in reserve and deployed only if necessary19.
- Promote transparency and accountability: Ensure that law enforcement responses to protests are measured and proportionate, with clear guidelines for protecting constitutional rights19.
For Law Enforcement Agencies:
- Prioritize de-escalation: Focus on facilitating peaceful protests and protecting public safety while respecting the right to freedom of expression.
- Build community relationships: Engage in ongoing outreach with community leaders and protest groups to build trust and understanding19.
- Use social media effectively: Utilize social media as a tool for real-time outreach and communication with protesters and the public19.
- Publicize restrictions clearly: If restrictions on protests are necessary, publicize them clearly in advance through multiple channels20.
- Work with diverse messengers: Collaborate with trusted community members and organizations to communicate with protesters and address concerns20.
For International Organizations:
- Advocate for best practices: Promote international standards for protest measurement and ethical guidelines for data collection and use.
- Support local organizations: Provide resources and training to local organizations and researchers to improve their capacity for protest monitoring and analysis.
- Facilitate collaboration: Create platforms for sharing data and best practices among researchers and organizations across different countries21.
Conclusion
Measuring public protests is a complex endeavor that requires careful consideration of the different methodologies, ethical considerations, and the use of technology. By combining different approaches, researchers can gain a more nuanced understanding of the dynamics of social movements and the impact of collective action. This knowledge is crucial for policymakers, civil society organizations, and researchers seeking to understand and respond to public concerns in a democratic society.
Looking ahead, the field of protest measurement is likely to be further shaped by emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence and big data analytics. These technologies offer new possibilities for analyzing protest trends, predicting future events, and understanding the complex interplay of factors that drive collective action. However, it’s crucial to address the ethical challenges posed by these technologies and ensure that they are used responsibly and ethically. Ongoing research and adaptation of methodologies are essential to keep pace with the evolving nature of protests and the increasing use of technology in both organizing and monitoring them.
Works cited
- portal.cops.usdoj.gov, accessed January 18, 2025, https://portal.cops.usdoj.gov/resourcecenter/content.ashx/cops-p459-pub.pdf
- The Complexities of Global Protests | Carnegie Endowment for …, accessed January 18, 2025, https://carnegieendowment.org/2015/10/08/complexities-of-global-protests-pub-61537
- www.hbs.edu, accessed January 18, 2025, https://www.hbs.edu/ris/Publication%20Files/When%20are%20social%20protests%20effective_67978754-eaf9-4414-aae1-16db9ef13812.pdf
- Measuring and Understanding Contemporary Street Protest | The …, accessed January 18, 2025, https://irwg.umich.edu/news/measuring-and-understanding-contemporary-street-protest
- US Crisis Monitor – ACLED, accessed January 18, 2025, https://acleddata.com/us-crisis-monitor/
- Demonstrations and Political Violence in America: New Data for …, accessed January 18, 2025, https://acleddata.com/2020/09/03/demonstrations-political-violence-in-america-new-data-for-summer-2020/
- users.ox.ac.uk, accessed January 18, 2025, https://users.ox.ac.uk/~sfos0060/sizematters.pdf
- Dangers of technological surveillance in policing public protests …, accessed January 18, 2025, https://phm.org.uk/blogposts/dangers-of-technological-surveillance-in-policing-public-protests/
- Can You Hear Me Now? How Communication Technology Affects …, accessed January 18, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6461378/
- Measuring and Analyzing Protest Potential From a Survey Data Recycling Framework, accessed January 18, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352412881_Measuring_and_Analyzing_Protest_Potential_From_a_Survey_Data_Recycling_Framework
- The digital repression of social movements, protest, and activism: A …, accessed January 18, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10953837/
- Ethical considerations toward protestware – InK@SMU.edu.sg, accessed January 18, 2025, https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=9763&context=sis_research
- The student journalist’s guide to ethically covering protest – Center …, accessed January 18, 2025, https://ethics.journalism.wisc.edu/2021/05/24/the-student-journalists-guide-to-ethically-covering-protest/
- The science of contemporary street protest: New efforts in the United …, accessed January 18, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6810161/
- Protest Escalation: A Comparative Case Study Exploring Tools for Police for Successful Protest Engagement – DigitalCommons@CSP, accessed January 18, 2025, https://digitalcommons.csp.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1018&context=cup_commons_grad_ids
- Measuring protest through news articles: A validation approach for manual and semi-supervised methods using government data – OSF, accessed January 18, 2025, https://osf.io/g9t8y/download
- Protest-Case Analysis: A Methodological Approach for the Study of Grassroots Environmental Mobilizations by Maria Kousis, accessed January 18, 2025, https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/51334/570.pdf
- More Minnesota charter schools are facing possible termination – Star Tribune, accessed January 18, 2025, https://www.startribune.com/more-minnesota-charter-schools-are-facing-possible-termination/601207794
- Law Enforcement Guidance For Policing Public Demonstrations, accessed January 18, 2025, https://www.law.georgetown.edu/icap/wp-content/uploads/sites/32/2021/04/ICAP-Law-Enforcement-Demonstrations-Guidance-4-19.21.pdf
- Best Practices | Protests & Public Safety: A Guide for Cities & Citizens, accessed January 18, 2025, https://constitutionalprotestguide.org/best-practices/
- Best practice and recommendations – CIVICUS Protest Resilience Toolkit, accessed January 18, 2025, https://prt.civicus.org/best-practice/
Serbian 
English